Next Story
Newszop

Does freelancing for US clients pay more than Indian jobs? Redditor sparks debate as netizens deliver a reality check

Send Push
Is working with US clients the golden ticket Indian developers have been waiting for? That’s what one Redditor seemed to suggest in a post that quickly sparked debate among tech professionals across r/developersIndia. Titled “Freelancing for US clients is easier and pays more than jobs,” the post laid out a seemingly straightforward roadmap to earning in dollars and ditching the traditional Indian job grind. But as with most things that sound too good to be true, fellow Redditors were quick to inject some hard-earned realism into the conversation.

The Allure of Dollar-Paid Flexibility
The original post painted an enticing picture: skip the maze of entrance tests and interview rounds required for local jobs that pay between ₹25,000 to ₹60,000 a month. Instead, build a portfolio, hop onto platforms like Upwork or Contra, and tap into US-based gigs that offer anywhere between $25 to $50 an hour—translating to ₹1.5–3 lakh monthly, even with part-time hours.

According to the Redditor, the process isn’t rocket science. From bug-fixing tasks to designing landing pages, the post claimed that Indian developers were skilled enough to take on these roles—it’s just that many weren’t aware freelancing was a legitimate, and potentially lucrative, career path.


Reality Hits Back: “It’s Not That Simple”
But the comments section had a very different tone. One user called it “a post borne out of wishful thinking,” highlighting how incredibly difficult it is for beginners to get noticed amid intense competition from independent agencies and experienced freelancers.


Another user, who had dabbled in freelancing before starting a full-time role post-masters, shared that gaining traction required more than just a resume. Submitting a working prototype with each proposal was what eventually landed them clients—underscoring that creating trust with potential employers is a challenge, especially when competing against profiles stacked with five-star ratings.
image
The Devil in the Details
A more detailed breakdown came from a user who pointed out that the high pay typically applies only to certain niches—primarily full-stack web development. Fields like QA, testing, product management, and data analytics rarely offer the same kind of freelancing windfall.

And there are costs beyond effort. For those juggling full-time work and freelance gigs, 15–18 hour days aren’t uncommon, leading to health, sleep, and hygiene issues. Others flagged logistical and financial concerns, from dealing with tax implications and dual employment verification to navigating platforms like Wise or Payoneer without raising red flags in one's Form 26AS.

One user even advised setting up an entirely separate bank account—and warned against trusting relatives or friends with freelance income details, citing an increasingly toxic and opportunistic environment around money.

A Hybrid Approach?
Some users advocated a balanced route—starting with a stable full-time job while building a freelance portfolio on the side. Once the freelance income matched or exceeded their regular salary, they suggested only then considering the switch to full-time freelancing.

It’s clear from the responses that while freelancing with international clients can be lucrative, it’s no shortcut. It demands persistence, a well-curated portfolio, networking savvy, and most importantly, realistic expectations.

So, while the dream of dollar-denominated income remains alive, the Reddit thread served as a timely reminder that behind every “easy money” claim lies a much more complex, and often taxing, reality. Would you take the leap or stick to the stable route?
Loving Newspoint? Download the app now